Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Vampire's Fate
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 87.00%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 3,003×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Horror
VS
Dead or Alive 2
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.80%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,600×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Horror
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 87.00% against 96.80% — Dead or Alive 2 is 9.80 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.9×: 3,003× against 1,600×, with Vampire's Fate higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Dead or Alive 2 does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Dead or Alive 2 returns more in theory over the long run, while Vampire's Fate reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Horror.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
