Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Viking's Plunder
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 93.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 1,869×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
VS
Barnstormer Bucks
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 94.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 1,888×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Thunderstruck
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.10%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Viking's Plunder vs Barnstormer Bucks
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 93.00% against 94.00% — Barnstormer Bucks is 1.00 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,869× and 1,888×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Viking's Plunder vs Thunderstruck
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 93.00% against 96.10% — Thunderstruck is 3.10 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility labels differ: Medium against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Shared theme signals: Norse myth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
