Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Viking's Plunder
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 93.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 1,869×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
VS
Asgard
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.48%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 600×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 93.00% against 96.48% — Asgard is 3.48 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 3.1×: 1,869× against 600×, with Viking's Plunder higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility labels differ: Medium against Low. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Asgard returns more in theory over the long run, while Viking's Plunder reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Norse myth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
