Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Habanero

Habanero

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 86.00% against 86.00%.
Win caps differ by about 2.5×: 188× against 461×, with Colossal Gems higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
Shared theme signals: Wealth.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Habanero and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 86.00% against 97.12% — Rage to Riches is 11.12 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.5×: 188× against 75×, with Wealth Inn higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Rage to Riches returns more in theory over the long run, while Wealth Inn reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Wealth.

Add to the comparison (up to four)