Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Wealth Inn
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 188×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Horse's Treasures
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Adventure, Wealth
VS
Colossal Gems
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 461×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Wealth Inn vs Horse's Treasures
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Horse's Treasures does not publish one.
- Volatility labels differ: Low against Medium. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Wealth Inn vs Colossal Gems
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 86.00% against 86.00%.
- Win caps differ by about 2.5×: 188× against 461×, with Colossal Gems higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
