Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Habanero

Habanero

NetEnt

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP: 87.00% against 86.00% — Witches Tome is 1.00 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 7,307× and 8,006×.
Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Witches Tome returns more in theory over the long run, while Mount Mazuma reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Wealth.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Habanero and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 87.00% against 96.11% — Silverback Gold™ is 9.11 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 7,307× against 9,300×, with Silverback Gold™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Silverback Gold™ does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Wealth.

Add to the comparison (up to four)