Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Zeus 2
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 92.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Greek myth
VS
Buggy Bonus
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 92.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Mythic Maiden™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.58%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,100×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Greek myth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Zeus 2 vs Buggy Bonus
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 92.00% against 92.00%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 500× and 500×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Zeus 2 vs Mythic Maiden™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Habanero and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 92.00% against 96.58% — Mythic Maiden™ is 4.58 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 4.2×: 500× against 2,100×, with Mythic Maiden™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Mythic Maiden™ does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Greek myth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
