Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Arizona James and The Lost Relics
Hacksaw Gaming
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.28%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 25,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Heart of Cleopatra
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.48%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Hacksaw Gaming and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.28% against 96.48% — Heart of Cleopatra is 0.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.5×: 25,000× against 10,000×, with Arizona James and The Lost Relics higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Arizona James and The Lost Relics does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Heart of Cleopatra returns more in theory over the long run, while Arizona James and The Lost Relics reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
