Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Epic Ze Zeus
Hacksaw Gaming
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.22%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Greek myth
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.22% against 96.28% — Arizona James and The Lost Relics is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 50,000× against 25,000×, with Epic Ze Zeus higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Epic Ze Zeus does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Arizona James and The Lost Relics returns more in theory over the long run, while Epic Ze Zeus reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
