Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Hacksaw Gaming

Nolimit City

PG Soft

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Hacksaw Gaming and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.22% against 96.17%.
Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 50,000× against 44,288×, with Epic Ze Zeus higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Epic Ze Zeus does not publish a rating.

Different format families: Epic Ze Zeus is Cluster pays, Mythical Guardians is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Hacksaw Gaming and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.22% against 96.76% — Mythical Guardians is 0.54 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 3.3×: 50,000× against 15,000×, with Epic Ze Zeus higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Epic Ze Zeus does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Mythical Guardians returns more in theory over the long run, while Epic Ze Zeus reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Greek myth.

Add to the comparison (up to four)