Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Grug Make Fire
Hacksaw Gaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Ancient Egypt
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.13%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 10,400×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Egypt
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Hacksaw Gaming and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.19% against 96.13% — Grug Make Fire is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,400×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Grug Make Fire does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Grug Make Fire returns more in theory over the long run, while Ancient Egypt reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
