Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Le Hooligan
Hacksaw Gaming
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.34%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Mahjong Wilds Link&Merge
Microgaming
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.16%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Hacksaw Gaming and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.34% against 96.16% — Le Hooligan is 0.18 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Le Hooligan does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Le Hooligan returns more in theory over the long run, while Mahjong Wilds Link&Merge reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
