Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Hacksaw Gaming

Nolimit City

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Hacksaw Gaming and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.34% against 96.05% — Le Hooligan is 0.29 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.5×: 10,000× against 25,420×, with DJ Psycho higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Le Hooligan does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Le Hooligan returns more in theory over the long run, while DJ Psycho reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Different format families: Le Hooligan is Cluster pays, Frozen Gems is Ways to win. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Hacksaw Gaming and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.34% against 96.36%.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Le Hooligan does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)