Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Le Hooligan
Hacksaw Gaming
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.34%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Heart of Cleopatra
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.48%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Frozen Gems
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.36%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Le Hooligan vs Heart of Cleopatra
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Hacksaw Gaming and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.34% against 96.48% — Heart of Cleopatra is 0.14 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Le Hooligan does not publish a rating.
Le Hooligan vs Frozen Gems
- Different format families: Le Hooligan is Cluster pays, Frozen Gems is Ways to win. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Hacksaw Gaming and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.34% against 96.36%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Le Hooligan does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
