Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Hacksaw Gaming

Microgaming

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Hacksaw Gaming and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: Suck does not publish one.
Volatility cannot be compared: Le Prechaun does not publish a rating.

Different format families: Le Prechaun is Cluster pays, Wildhound Derby is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Hacksaw Gaming and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 97.52% against 96.93% — Le Prechaun is 0.59 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 15,000× and 15,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Le Prechaun does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Le Prechaun returns more in theory over the long run, while Wildhound Derby reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)