Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Max Win Machine
Hacksaw Gaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.22%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Temple of Three
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Adventure
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Hacksaw Gaming and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.22% against 96.20%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Max Win Machine does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Max Win Machine returns more in theory over the long run, while Temple of Three reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
