Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
3rd Base
Microgaming
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.29%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,114×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Sports
VS
Diamonds Of Egypt
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.49%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Egypt, Fruit & classic
VS
Break Away Max
Microgaming
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Sports
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
3rd Base vs Diamonds Of Egypt
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.29% against 96.49% — Diamonds Of Egypt is 0.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 2,114× against 2,500×, with Diamonds Of Egypt higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
3rd Base vs Break Away Max
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- RTP cannot be compared: Break Away Max does not publish one.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: Sports.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
