Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

African Quest
Microgaming
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.02%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Adventure
VS

Pixies vs Pirates
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 95.91%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 11,907×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Adventure
VS

3x Catch
Booongo
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
African Quest vs Pixies vs Pirates
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.02% against 95.91% — African Quest is 0.11 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility cannot be compared: African Quest does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure.
African Quest vs 3x Catch
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: African Quest does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)



