Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

African Quest

Microgaming

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.02%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
Not published
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Adventure
Free demo available →
VS

Pixies vs Pirates

Nolimit City

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
95.91%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
11,907×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Adventure
Free demo available →
VS

Supreme Zeus

Hacksaw Gaming

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.39%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
12,500×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Greek myth

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

African Quest vs Pixies vs Pirates

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Microgaming and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.02% against 95.91% — African Quest is 0.11 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: African Quest does not publish a rating.
  • Shared theme signals: Adventure.

African Quest vs Supreme Zeus

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Microgaming and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.02% against 96.39% — Supreme Zeus is 0.37 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: African Quest does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)