Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
African Wilds
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 95.94%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Lucky Rabbit Fortunes
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 95.94%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Primal Rampage
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
African Wilds vs Lucky Rabbit Fortunes
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 95.94% against 95.94%.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
African Wilds vs Primal Rampage
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 95.94% against 96.20% — Primal Rampage is 0.26 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
