Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Age of Discovery
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.62%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Music & party
VS
Warrior Graveyard xNudge®
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.16%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 9,797×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Music & party
VS
Rocket Wins
Booongo
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Music & party, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Age of Discovery vs Warrior Graveyard xNudge®
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.62% against 96.16% — Age of Discovery is 0.46 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Warrior Graveyard xNudge® does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Music & party.
Age of Discovery vs Rocket Wins
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Rocket Wins does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Rocket Wins does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Music & party.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
