Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Alaskan Fishing
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.63%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Death Dominion
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.54%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Cruise Royale
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.65%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Alaskan Fishing vs Death Dominion
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.63% against 96.54% — Alaskan Fishing is 0.09 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Alaskan Fishing vs Cruise Royale
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.63% against 96.65%.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Cruise Royale does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
