Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Asian Beauty
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.40%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
4 Diamond Blues Megaways™
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.40%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
VS
Happy Nets
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Asian Beauty vs 4 Diamond Blues Megaways™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.40% against 96.40%.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Asian Beauty does not publish a rating.
Asian Beauty vs Happy Nets
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.40% against 96.50% — Happy Nets is 0.10 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Asian Beauty does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
