Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Aurora Wilds
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Crypto Gold
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Music & party, Wealth
VS
Diamond Inferno
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Aurora Wilds vs Crypto Gold
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.20% against 96.19%.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Crypto Gold does not publish a rating.
Aurora Wilds vs Diamond Inferno
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.20% against 96.19%.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
