Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Beautiful Bones

Microgaming

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.55%
Volatility
Low
Win cap
Not published
Reels
5
Theme signals
Horror
Free demo available →
VS

Dead Men Walking

Nolimit City

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.20%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
25,313×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Horror
Free demo available →
VS

Supreme Zeus

Hacksaw Gaming

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.39%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
12,500×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Greek myth

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Beautiful Bones vs Dead Men Walking

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Microgaming and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.55% against 96.20% — Beautiful Bones is 0.35 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Dead Men Walking does not publish a rating.
  • Shared theme signals: Horror.

Beautiful Bones vs Supreme Zeus

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Microgaming and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.55% against 96.39% — Beautiful Bones is 0.16 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Supreme Zeus does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)