Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Blazing Mammoth

Microgaming

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
96.24%
Volatility
Low
Win cap
Not published
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →
VS

Fruits

Nolimit City

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
96.23%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
2,910×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Fruit & classic
Free demo available →
VS

Double Fortune

PG Soft

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
96.22%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
100,000×
Reels
5
Theme signals
East Asia
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Blazing Mammoth vs Fruits

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Microgaming and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.24% against 96.23%.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Fruits does not publish a rating.

Blazing Mammoth vs Double Fortune

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Microgaming and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.24% against 96.22%.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Double Fortune does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)