Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Bonny’s Treasures
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.09%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure
VS
Temple of Prosperity
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure
VS
Adventure Palace
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.10%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Animals, Adventure
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Bonny’s Treasures vs Temple of Prosperity
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.09% against 96.20% — Temple of Prosperity is 0.11 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure.
Bonny’s Treasures vs Adventure Palace
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.09% against 96.10%.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
