Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Microgaming

Hacksaw Gaming

PG Soft

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Microgaming and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.21% against 96.34% — Le Hooligan is 0.13 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 5,000× against 10,000×, with Le Hooligan higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Le Hooligan does not publish a rating.

Different format families: Candy Rush Wilds 2 is Cluster pays, Chocolate Deluxe is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Microgaming and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.21% against 96.75% — Chocolate Deluxe is 0.54 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Chocolate Deluxe does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Sweets.

Add to the comparison (up to four)