Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Cat Clans
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Flying Pigs
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 25×
- Reels
- 25
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Wolf Blaze Megaways™
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 95.98%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Cat Clans vs Flying Pigs
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Flying Pigs does not publish one.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Cat Clans vs Wolf Blaze Megaways™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.00% against 95.98%.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
