Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Microgaming

Pragmatic Play

PG Soft

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Microgaming and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: Hockey Attack does not publish one.
Win caps differ by about 4.0×: 10,000× against 2,500×, with Cricket Century Kings higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Shared theme signals: Sports.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Microgaming and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.05% against 96.74% — Touchdown Wins is 0.69 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 10,000× against 5,000×, with Cricket Century Kings higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Touchdown Wins does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Touchdown Wins returns more in theory over the long run, while Cricket Century Kings reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Sports.

Add to the comparison (up to four)