Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Cricket Star
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.29%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon, Sports
VS
Starstruck
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,635×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
VS
Basketball Star on Fire
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon, Sports
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Cricket Star vs Starstruck
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.29% against 96.19% — Cricket Star is 0.10 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Starstruck does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon.
Cricket Star vs Basketball Star on Fire
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- RTP cannot be compared: Basketball Star on Fire does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Basketball Star on Fire does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon, Sports.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
