Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Cricket Star

Microgaming

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
96.29%
Volatility
High
Win cap
Not published
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Sci-fi & neon, Sports
Free demo available →
VS

Starstruck

Nolimit City

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
96.19%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
1,635×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Sci-fi & neon
Free demo available →
VS

Dr. Toonz

Play’n GO

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
96.25%
Volatility
High
Win cap
22,000×
Reels
0
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Cricket Star vs Starstruck

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Microgaming and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.29% against 96.19% — Cricket Star is 0.10 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Starstruck does not publish a rating.
  • Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon.

Cricket Star vs Dr. Toonz

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Microgaming and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.29% against 96.25%.
  • Both carry the same volatility label: High.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)