Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Dragon Shard
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.77%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Lucky Little Dragons
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.55%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,044×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Gemix
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.83%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 3×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Dragon Shard vs Lucky Little Dragons
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.77% against 96.55% — Dragon Shard is 0.22 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Dragon Shard vs Gemix
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.77% against 96.83% — Gemix is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
