Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Genie’s Fortune Wishes
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 2,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Fantasy
VS

Possessed Fortunes
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 2,400×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Fantasy, Horror
VS
Caishen Wins
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Genie’s Fortune Wishes vs Possessed Fortunes
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.00% against 96.00%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 2,000× against 2,400×, with Possessed Fortunes higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia, Fantasy.
Genie’s Fortune Wishes vs Caishen Wins
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Caishen Wins does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Caishen Wins does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)


