Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Heavenly Elephant Fortune
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.27%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Animals, Wealth
VS
Fox Mayhem
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 4,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.27% against 96.20% — Heavenly Elephant Fortune is 0.07 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.5×: 10,000× against 4,000×, with Heavenly Elephant Fortune higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility labels differ: Low against Medium. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia, Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
