Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Microgaming

Pragmatic Play

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Microgaming and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.55% against 96.50%.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,044× and 5,000×.
Volatility labels differ: Medium against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
Shared theme signals: Music & party.

Different format families: Ice Pop Party is Cluster pays, Banana Rock is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Microgaming and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.55% against 96.60%.
Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 5,044× against 2,500×, with Ice Pop Party higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Banana Rock returns more in theory over the long run, while Ice Pop Party reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Music & party.

Add to the comparison (up to four)