Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Microgaming

Hacksaw Gaming

Pragmatic Play

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Microgaming and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.15% against 96.34% — Le Hooligan is 0.19 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 15,000× against 10,000×, with Kung Pao Panda higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Le Hooligan does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Le Hooligan returns more in theory over the long run, while Kung Pao Panda reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Microgaming and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.15% against 96.06% — Kung Pao Panda is 0.09 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 15,000× against 10,000×, with Kung Pao Panda higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Add to the comparison (up to four)