Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Kung Pao Panda

Microgaming

Format family
Cluster pays
RTP
96.15%
Volatility
High
Win cap
15,000×
Reels
6
Theme signals
East Asia
Free demo available →
VS

DJ Psycho

Nolimit City

Format family
Cluster pays
RTP
96.05%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
25,420×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →
VS

Le Hooligan

Hacksaw Gaming

Format family
Cluster pays
RTP
96.34%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
10,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Kung Pao Panda vs DJ Psycho

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Microgaming and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.15% against 96.05% — Kung Pao Panda is 0.10 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 15,000× against 25,420×, with DJ Psycho higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: DJ Psycho does not publish a rating.
  • Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Kung Pao Panda returns more in theory over the long run, while DJ Psycho reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Kung Pao Panda vs Le Hooligan

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Microgaming and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.15% against 96.34% — Le Hooligan is 0.19 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 15,000× against 10,000×, with Kung Pao Panda higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Le Hooligan does not publish a rating.
  • Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Le Hooligan returns more in theory over the long run, while Kung Pao Panda reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)