Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Microgaming

Nolimit City

Microgaming

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Microgaming and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.05% against 96.48% — Coins of Fortune is 0.43 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 10,000× against 6,015×, with Land of Fortunes higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Coins of Fortune does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Coins of Fortune returns more in theory over the long run, while Land of Fortunes reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: East Asia, Wealth.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP: 96.05% against 96.19% — Lucky Firecracker is 0.14 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Volatility labels differ: High against Medium. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
Shared theme signals: East Asia, Wealth.

Add to the comparison (up to four)