Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Land of Fortunes
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.05%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Wealth
VS
Cash Box
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.02%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Wealth
VS
Lucky Firecracker
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Land of Fortunes vs Cash Box
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.05% against 96.02%.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 10,000× against 5,000×, with Land of Fortunes higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia, Wealth.
Land of Fortunes vs Lucky Firecracker
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.05% against 96.19% — Lucky Firecracker is 0.14 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility labels differ: High against Medium. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia, Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
