Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Lucky Koi
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.47%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Wealth
VS
3 Super Hungry Pandas
Booongo
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Wealth
VS
Lucky Firecracker
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Lucky Koi vs 3 Super Hungry Pandas
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: 3 Super Hungry Pandas does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: 3 Super Hungry Pandas does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia, Wealth.
Lucky Koi vs Lucky Firecracker
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.47% against 96.19% — Lucky Koi is 0.28 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia, Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
