Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Lucky Little Dragons
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.55%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,044×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Dragon Shard
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.77%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Golden Caravan
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Lucky Little Dragons vs Dragon Shard
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.55% against 96.77% — Dragon Shard is 0.22 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Lucky Little Dragons vs Golden Caravan
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.55% against 96.19% — Lucky Little Dragons is 0.36 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,044× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
