Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Lucky Twins Wilds

Microgaming

Format family
Cluster pays
RTP
Not published
Volatility
Medium
Win cap
Not published
Reels
6
Theme signals
East Asia, Wealth
Free demo available →
VS

Arizona James and The Lost Relics

Hacksaw Gaming

Format family
Cluster pays
RTP
96.28%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
25,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Microgaming and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • RTP cannot be compared: Lucky Twins Wilds does not publish one.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Arizona James and The Lost Relics does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)