Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Lucky Firecracker
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Wealth
VS
Midas Fortune
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.73%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Wealth
VS
Lucky Koi
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.47%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Lucky Firecracker vs Midas Fortune
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.19% against 96.73% — Midas Fortune is 0.54 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Midas Fortune does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia, Wealth.
Lucky Firecracker vs Lucky Koi
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.19% against 96.47% — Lucky Koi is 0.28 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia, Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
