Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Luna Princess Link&Merge
Microgaming
- Format family
- Link & Merge
- RTP
- 96.23%
- Volatility
- Medium-high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Monkey: Battle for the Scrolls
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.21%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Luna Princess Link&Merge is Link & Merge, Monkey: Battle for the Scrolls is Ways to win. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.23% against 96.21%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility labels differ: Medium-high against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Luna Princess Link&Merge returns more in theory over the long run, while Monkey: Battle for the Scrolls reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
