Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Microgaming

Play’n GO

PG Soft

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Microgaming and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.10% against 96.21% — Ghost of Dead is 0.11 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
Both carry the same volatility label: High.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Microgaming and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.10% against 96.03% — 暴走鸭帮 is 0.07 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Emperor's Favour does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. 暴走鸭帮 returns more in theory over the long run, while Emperor's Favour reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)