Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

暴走鸭帮
Microgaming
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.10%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS

Happy Nets
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Ghost of Dead
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.21%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Horror
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
暴走鸭帮 vs Happy Nets
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.10% against 96.50% — Happy Nets is 0.40 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
暴走鸭帮 vs Ghost of Dead
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.10% against 96.21% — Ghost of Dead is 0.11 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Add to the comparison (up to four)



