Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pocket Ace

Microgaming

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.03%
Volatility
Medium
Win cap
Not published
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published
VS

Catfish Hunters

Nolimit City

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.03%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
20,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Animals
Free demo available →
VS

Supreme Zeus

Hacksaw Gaming

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.39%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
12,500×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Greek myth

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Pocket Ace vs Catfish Hunters

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Microgaming and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.03% against 96.03%.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Catfish Hunters does not publish a rating.

Pocket Ace vs Supreme Zeus

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Microgaming and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.03% against 96.39% — Supreme Zeus is 0.36 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Supreme Zeus does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)