Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Microgaming

Play’n GO

PG Soft

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Microgaming and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.00% against 96.21% — Ghost of Dead is 0.21 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 4.2×: 2,400× against 10,000×, with Ghost of Dead higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Shared theme signals: Horror.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Microgaming and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.00% against 96.74% — Fortune Dragon is 0.74 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,400× and 2,500×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Fortune Dragon does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Add to the comparison (up to four)