Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Queen of Cairo: Royal Maxways
Microgaming
- Format family
- Maxways
- RTP
- 96.59%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Egypt, Animals
VS
Anubis Wrath
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.75%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Egypt
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Queen of Cairo: Royal Maxways is Maxways, Anubis Wrath is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.59% against 96.75% — Anubis Wrath is 0.16 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Anubis Wrath does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Egypt.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
